Editorial: A Window into the World of the Critic

When I read this article, I could feel myself wanting to hate it based on the title alone. I was fully seething before the page even loaded. Bloggers are harming literature by their opinions and limited education? How dare this ivory-tower academic peer through a window into the world of blogging and proclaim it wanting? And then I thought: Yes, this could simply be snobbery of the worst kind, or maybe Sir Peter just doesn’t understand the point of blogging at all.

But the situation is not so coarse or simple.

Peter Stothard is the editor who shepherded The Times through a noisy price war, changing the face of popular British journalism. He documented Tony Blair’s political battles during the Iraq war. He’s also a published author. The man is also a bit of a blogger: His articles at the Times Literary Supplement blog range from the straightforward to the slightly opaque, with some reasonably personal posts in the mix–such as this obituary of a Times colleague.

It’d be worth your time to read the original article, but here’s the money quote:

“It is wonderful that there are so many blogs and websites devoted to books, but to be a critic is to be importantly different than those sharing their own taste… Not everyone’s opinion is worth the same.”

It’d be far too simple to label this as snobbery, as blogger Simon Savidge did, or see it as a desire to maintain the old status quo. But it’s worth remembering this quote is from a man whose home is lined with bookshelves, whose life is dedicated to reading and judging what be considers to be important books. His devotion to the written word is no less real than that of any bibliophilic blogger. His writing style is formal but far from stuffy. His memoir, On the Spartacus Road, is steeped in Roman history. Peter Stothard is clearly not an unintelligent man grumpy at the changes brought about by the intertubes, or a defensive critic looking to protect his job. He simply is concerned that the public get their opinions from what he sees as the proper sources.

Photo by mpclemens

But here he misses out on something vital: The situation is not one of simply gleaning opinions from the web. Not only are readers reading blog posts about books, but these bloggers are having an effect on the books they read. And authors don’t just read these blogs, they are frequently part of this community, and their feedback matters. Even published authors are now taking feedback from the web quite seriously. Writers cultivate relationships with their online readers, attempting to ingratiate themselves into this network of readers and writers.

And how does all this affect how a review is written? For some writers, fellow bloggers are closer to being peers than they are critics. In this regard, the detached critic has a clear advantage over the book blogger.

With older works, critics will bring the vast history of antiquity into the mix, the viewpoint of a reader contemporary to the work. Some books can stand up to this kind of scrutiny, some cannot. Those that can bear the weight of critical analysis are sometimes called “classics”. Sometimes when a classic becomes difficult to read, it’s re-published with annotations and notes.

Sir Peter recognizes that the situation is not a simple one of blogs versus the literary establishment. Words are words, no matter if they’re in ink or on a phone screen. Blogging can become sophisticated indeed, but the odds are against the lone blogger who has no gatekeeper, no editor. There are no peers or coworkers around the espresso machine in the lounge, and there are no researchers down the hall in the fact-checking department to keep the words honest. (Even a blog like this, with an editor assigning stories, is an exception and a small-time operation run between internet colleagues.)

Maybe, in Peter Stothard’s opinion, the masses of readers will tend to conflate unreasoned gut reactions with opinions built upon a structure of logic and history. But I just don’t know. It’d be helpful to read the complete interview and not just the small window into it that the article provides.

While I don’t have any easy answers to Sir Peter’s assertions, I think that this lack of clear expectations is important. Is a random book review headline in my WordPress feed attempting serious criticism? Is it tossing out opinions on the latest beach read? Most likely it’s a mix of these, with no differentiation between the extremes. But simply reading the article will solve the problem if putting it into perspective.

Seeing all of this as “critics versus bloggers” does a disservice to both sorts of writers. I think that blogging and the critics can happily coexist, serving their own purposes. An article in The Times and a Goodreads review serve very different functions, and we would all do well to remember that.

This article would be much poorer without the help of Julie Goldberg and Leanne Yong.

Neil Fein is a freelance editor who specializes in novels. If you’ve written a manuscript or are getting close to finishing, you can get in touch with him here, and even ask for a free sample edit. He rides his bicycle as much as he can, and he paints when he damn well feels like it. He also plays acoustic guitar in the bands Baroque & Hungry.

His other band, The Trouvères, is currently on tour and can be seen at the Connecticut Renaissance Faire through the end of October.


One thought on “Editorial: A Window into the World of the Critic

Add yours

  1. Perhaps he just an intellectual snob who resents the interlopers. He comes from a time when the journalist was king. His profession is now somewhat tainted by plagiarism, information that is often released too soon, lack of proper fact-checking, etc. So I think he is probably feeling threatened to some degree — if not personally, than as a member of the ranks of ‘esteemed’ journalists. He’s not the only one. I’ve heard many, many journalists deriding bloggers. Because they’re threatened, just like the publications they work for are threatened by the online world, and what it’s doing to their business model. Change is scary, especially when you’re not prepared for it. And they weren’t. A couple of years ago I worked on an advertising project for a major packaged goods client. One of the key components of their campaign was working with a blogger, here in Canada, whose audience is young mothers. At that time she had a following of well more than 500,000 women. God knows what it is now. But the point is, she influences their purchase decisions. This client tracked all their activity as it related to her, so they know to the dollar how important she has become to their company. Show me a journalist who’s done that. Don’t misunderstand. I have a lot of respect for good journalists. They have their place in the world. All I’m saying is, this is a new world and there’s room for a lot of opinions. Different opinions, and different kinds of opinions. Great, thought-provoking post. Thanks.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: